Profits over indigenous people? Human rights advocates warn vs new FPIC process

Profits over indigenous people? Human rights advocates warn vs new FPIC process

Human rights lawyer Raymond Baguilat says the revised guidelines risk simplifying the process to facilitate business faster 'rather than ensuring that indigenous peoples’ rights are fully respected'

MANILA, Philippines – The revised guidelines on the free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) that indigenous peoples give to projects in their ancestral domains “raise serious concerns” and threaten their rights over land, according to human rights advocates.

The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) updated the previous 2012 guidelines last September.

Among the criticisms is the stricter time frame for community assemblies. The revised guidelines require the assembly to be completed within 10 days for large-scale projects with potential irreversible impacts and within five days for projects with more limited impacts.

This categorization of projects is another source of criticism as it appears to “undervalue” impacts on people and land. Proposed projects have been categorized based on the degree of impact they are expected to inflict on the land. The approval process varies with each category.

According to human rights lawyer Raymond Baguilat, the revised guidelines risk simplifying the process to facilitate business faster “rather than ensuring that indigenous peoples’ rights are fully respected.”

“At its core, FPIC is a safeguard of indigenous peoples’ collective rights, particularly their right to self-determination, self-governance, and ownership of their ancestral domains and resources,” said Baguilat in his statement that was read during a House hearing on Tuesday, November 10.

In brief

MANILA, Philippines – The revised guidelines on the free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) that indigenous peoples give to projects in their ancestral domains “raise serious concerns” and threaten their rights over land, according to human rights advocates. According to human rights lawyer Raymond Baguilat, the revised guidelines risk simplifying the process to facilitate business faster “rather than ensuring that indigenous peoples’ rights are fully respected.

This is the opening of the story, shared with credit to Rappler (Philippines). The rest of the report — with every detail — continues on the publisher’s website.

Continue reading at Rappler (Philippines) ↗

Cookie settings

Choose which cookies we may use. You can change this at any time from Cookie settings in the footer. Details of each cookie are in the Cookie Policy.

Strictly necessary

Needed for sign-in, security, payments and remembering these choices. Always on.

Preferences

Remember settings such as dark mode.

Analytics & performance

Help us count visits, understand which pages, devices and countries our readers use, and measure how well the site performs – anonymous and aggregated.

Advertising & marketing

Lets advertising partners show and personalise adverts, measure impressions, clicks and visits, prevent ad fraud and pay us – this is how the free site is funded.

🔔 News notifications

Get headlines from NewsHub on this device — even when the site is closed.

You can switch this off at any time. Works on Android, Windows, Mac and Linux browsers; on iPhone/iPad add the site to your Home Screen first.