📰 Newspapers

Secret Erin Patterson evidence could cause 'massive publicity'

Secret Erin Patterson evidence could cause 'massive publicity'

Victoria's highest court says the evidence needs to remain under wraps, because there is a danger Patterson would face "unfair prejudice" if she is granted a retrial.

Victoria's highest court has dismissed a bid by media outlets to lift a suppression order over secret evidence in the Erin Patterson case.

The judges said, if published, the material would leave an "indelible impression" in the minds of jurors if Patterson was granted a re-trial on appeal.

The suppression order will lift if Patterson fails to apply for special leave to appeal to the High Court by November 27.

Evidence in the Erin Patterson case that would receive "massive publicity" remains suppressed by Victoria's courts, three years after she murdered her relatives with a beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms.

Last month, three judges of Victoria's Court of Appeal threw out Patterson's appeal against her convictions and changed her jail term to a life sentence without parole.

However the judges refused to lift a suppression order over a piece of evidence, in case Patterson succeeds in a last-ditch appeal to the High Court and is granted a retrial.

In a partially redacted judgment published online, the Court of Appeal said there was a danger Patterson would face "unfair prejudice" if potential jurors knew about the evidence.

"While the evidence is nuanced and complex, it would be likely to attract very significant publicity with the potential to cause a real and substantial risk of prejudice to any future trial,"…

In brief

Victoria's highest court has dismissed a bid by media outlets to lift a suppression order over secret evidence in the Erin Patterson case. The suppression order will lift if Patterson fails to apply for special leave to appeal to the High Court by November 27. However the judges refused to lift a suppression order over a piece of evidence, in case Patterson succeeds in a last-ditch appeal to the High Court and is granted a retrial.

This is the opening of the story, shared with credit to ABC News Australia. The rest of the report — with every detail — continues on the publisher’s website.

Continue reading at ABC News Australia ↗

Cookie settings

Choose which cookies we may use. You can change this at any time from Cookie settings in the footer. Details of each cookie are in the Cookie Policy.

Strictly necessary

Needed for sign-in, security, payments and remembering these choices. Always on.

Preferences

Remember settings such as dark mode.

Analytics & performance

Help us count visits, understand which pages, devices and countries our readers use, and measure how well the site performs – anonymous and aggregated.

Advertising & marketing

Lets advertising partners show and personalise adverts, measure impressions, clicks and visits, prevent ad fraud and pay us – this is how the free site is funded.

🔔 News notifications

Get headlines from NewsHub on this device — even when the site is closed.

You can switch this off at any time. Works on Android, Windows, Mac and Linux browsers; on iPhone/iPad add the site to your Home Screen first.